Re: Feedback from Distrowatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Serious question; Should the Fedora logo be changed?

It wouldn't just be the logo. It would wind up being the whole branding.

We've spent a LOT of time building this branding up - I think the
effects of diluting the brand  / muddying it with a new one would be
more far more detrimental.
>
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120507#news
>
> '
> The Fedora website provided fairly positive results. Everyone was able
> to find an appropriate download link for the Fedora ISOs. Likewise,
> people were able to find the documentation to walk them through an
> installation without too much trouble. What I found a bit amusing was
> that almost a third of the participants thought Fedora was some sort of
> Facebook plugin or application instead of a full operating system, due
> to the project's logo. This is one of those things people inside the
> Linux community would probably never consider, but there's a bit of a
> confusion over the brand (apparently) where outsiders are concerned."
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux