Re: [Design-team] Website redesign fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The stuff on stg.fp.o looks pretty stale compared to what I've seen in
the master branch several days ago.  Should stg.fp.o be refreshed, or
should we wait until the new POT/PO is issued?  And can it be
refreshed to reflect either a tag, or HEAD on an appropriate branch?

--
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
 gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
         Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com

 
I think that bug list is a great starting point!

The stg.fp.o website is build hourly with what's in the master branch. You should notice the new updates around :25 after the hour. There has been some instances that its not updating properly and that's because there is a bug on the server which is causing it to kernel panic (i think). In that case, nothing gets updated until the server is rebooted.

Sijis
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux