On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:52:07PM +0200, Jef van Schendel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As you probably know, the new Fedora website is being finished right now. > > Now we want to check everything and make sure it's all in tip top > shape and ready to be released. I've started a page[1] where we can > document all the little fixes that still need to be done. Think CSS > fixes, missing images, missing links, stuff like that. > > If you've got some time, please go over the pages on > http://stg.fedoraproject.org/ and check them for any > mistakes/errors/bugz. If you find any, post 'em on the page. :) > > Hop over to #fedora-websites if you've got any questions. > > Jef > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Website_redesign/WwwfpoFixes The stuff on stg.fp.o looks pretty stale compared to what I've seen in the master branch several days ago. Should stg.fp.o be refreshed, or should we wait until the new POT/PO is issued? And can it be refreshed to reflect either a tag, or HEAD on an appropriate branch? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
