On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Sijis Aviles <sijis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/7/25 Al Thomas <astavale@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Al, > > Wow! Great work. > > I am aware that 960.gs does have some shortcomings (multiple divs, > fixed, odd code, etc). However, I believe the benefits outweigh the > shortcomings of it. These are the reasons we are strongly focusing on > using 960: > * its a framework we can standardize across all fp.o domains > * an excellent way to build sites quickly > * a way communicate specs between designer and web developer > * its proven > > We have tried using the 960 fluid [1] version but that has proved > difficult to keep things inline as we'd hope. > > I would appreciate if you could help us, using 960, to merge your > example with what we have. Let me know if this is something that > interests you. I can grant you access to make that possible. > > Sijis > > [1] - http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs/ > I've made several updates to the current template using a few examples provided on your website. http://www.fedoracommunity.org/template.html. I did use dt tags instead of li tags for the community links.. but i may go to that after all. Sijis -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
