Re: Right place for Windows binaries on fp.o?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, you read that right. ;)
>
> As part of fixing up our documentation for verifying .iso's on
> Windows¹, we may end up producing a sha256sum.exe using MinGW, with
> some great help from Richard Jones and Jim Meyering.  We'd need a
> place to host this binary that the documentation can include.  Would
> fp.o/static/sha256sum.exe be reasonable or is there a better place for
> it?
>
> ¹ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/527060
>
> --
> Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> School is the advertising agency which makes you believe that you need
> the society as it is.
>    -- Ivan Illich -- "Deschooling Society"
>
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
>
>
I would put it in a subdirectory of /static/ like /static/software/,
/static/files/, just in the event we need to hosts other similar
type/random files.

Looking over the structure again /static/checksums/ is not a bad
location either.

Sijis

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux