On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mark<markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/7/11 Mel Chua <mel@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Thanks for pushing back and pointing out holes in my reasoning, btw - always >> good especially when it's 3:20am (...it's one of Those Nights when I can't >> sleep). >> >>> We really should just format the site differently - at the very least >>> have a different style sheet - to target this specifically if we decide >>> to support it. We don't officially now. >> >> Yay! wontfix, then. *docs at >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Heuristics#Screen_size* >> >>>> "some people will already come to fp.o knowing that they want to dl >>>> Fedora, even before taking the tour. Who are they?" >>>> >>>> * someone (I trust, possibly an Ambassador standing beside me) has >>>> already told me I should just download this "Fedora" thing and they'll help >>>> me get started >>>> >>>> * I do understand what I'd be getting; I already know what Fedora is and >>>> just need to grab an image file and am easily frustrated by Fitt's Law >>>> >>>> * some people blithely click on download links first, then figure out >>>> what they're getting afterwards. Not that it's a good idea, mind you... but >>>> I've watched enough people have this as almost a knee-jerk reaction to a >>>> webpage that... I mean, it happens. >>> >>> I agree with all of this, although i think the last two cases are far >>> less common than the first. >> >> I wonder if "IP addresses that have dl'd one of the prior Fedora releases >> before" vs "IP addresses that have not downloaded Fedora before" would be a >> useful differentiation metric for this - it's hard to tell who's actually >> arriving at the site for what. I'll have a chat with Ian (since he's doing >> similar work) about ways we might instrument things up better to get the >> kind of data these discussions should be based on... who else is into stats >> and metrics? >> >> --Mel >> > > Oke, great feedback on the feedback (although i seem to miss feedback > on the bottom part right after: "Mixed from: UxerX and UserY (and > others)")... > So some thoughts on that would be nice. > > Now for the feedback and what we do/won't do.. i suggest we use some > kind of system for that (MoSCoW).. > So, if we could all (Máirín, Mel, Hiemanshu and me) could all make a > MoSCow list of what we see as needed then discuss the lists in the > meeting next friday? > Just if you don't know what moscow is: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoSCoW_Method > > note: every line from: > http://fedora.mageprojects.com/fedora_feedback_anonymized.txt is a > problem or a possible solution that the users saw. so every line > should come back in one of the moscow sections (not multiple!). > > So in the end we end up with at least 4 lists with the following subjects: > > Must have > ---------------------- > < your items here > > > Could have > ---------------------- > < your items here > > > Should have > ---------------------- > < your items here > > > Won't have > ---------------------- > < your items here > > > And if you ask me as soon as we know the "Must have" part we can > actually start to make something. > Let me know what you think of this idea. > > Mark. > So, are we going to do this or not? -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
