Ricky Zhou wrote:
22:10 < ricky> Somebody suggested that we have a link to http://fedoraproject.org/verify on the get-fedora pages. I wonder where that should go... 22:10 < ricky> Hopefully, we can make it fit in with the friendliness of the page, if you know what I mean
Before we add another link to the page, can we get a bit more of the context on how users are expected to interact with these sums? How often do users typically use these? Is there any way to automate this verification process? Isn't there an option to verify your media when you go through anaconda? Is there a way we could provide only the relevant sum after the user has downloaded an ISO? (for example, the user clicks on the "Download Now!" link for the desktop live media, and they get a direct link to the iso and in the background the page reloads to a page with the sum for the desktop live media iso and instructions on how to use it?)
Are these sums something we only expect more advanced users to care about?
22:11 -!- cmpahar [n=cmpahar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #fedora-meeting 22:11 < ricky> Also, at least one person mentioned that they had to search for a second to find the "show me all options" link. Not sure if they were just too used to the old layout or if there's something we should change
This should take a second to find, as it's not meant to be front and center.
22:13 < ianweller> probably both good ideas. 22:13 < giarc> for verify, can we just put the link to it at the top, like this page: 22:13 < giarc> http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all 22:14 < ianweller> the /verify link could go in the sidebar. "Verify your ISOs!" 22:14 < ricky> I was thinking that it could go under resources 22:14 < giarc> ooh, i like that
Where is resources?
22:52 < ricky> The two security-related pages we have are http://fedoraproject.org/verify and http://fedoraproject.org/keys 22:52 < rsc> drago01: and thinking of proprietary software, which users will *definately* install (Nvidia, ATI, Flash, acroread), there are other nice problems. 22:52 < drago01> I am using 64 bit on my servers, desktop and laptop no issues that are arch specific .. the memory/diskspace is the only valid one but newer hw have enough to deal with that 22:52 < ricky> We're already planning to linnk /verify on the get-fedora pages 22:52 < ricky> Do you think most users need info from /keys? 22:52 < rsc> ricky: AFAIK the claims were related to the security team itself or to the updates with security infos 22:53 < rsc> ricky: let me maybe re-verify until the next meeting.
~m -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
