Máirín Duffy wrote: > Patrick C. F. Ernzer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 2008-10-01 18:06, Craig Thomas wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >> [...] >>>> (3) (MOST IMPORTANT) The get-fedora page, with all of the updates >>>> and suggestions that have been discussed since the F9 release >> [...] >>> and our draft implementation: >>> >>> http://craigt.fedorapeople.org/get-fedora/get-fedora > > The solution we had in the mockup (that this doesn't seem to be > following) was to just offer 32-bit live desktop by default and other > arches are hidden under a 'more options' link. > > Most consumer machines, especially now that Apple has gone with intel > chips, can run x86. If you have no idea of your machine's architecture > (and I am betting most folks who want to try Fedora for the first time > do not) x86 is a very safe bet. If you do know what your machine's arch > is, and it's not x86, you are more than capable to click one more link > to get x86_64 or ppc. > > This page is just too busy, IMHO. There is too much text, and it asks > too many questions. > > What our plan had been before when we discussed this, was to offer the > Fedora live desktop spin x86 with one click. fwiw here's my money where my mouth is: http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/get-fedora/ ~m -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
