Patrick C. F. Ernzer wrote: > Hello, > > On 2008-10-01 18:06, Craig Thomas wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: > [...] >>> (3) (MOST IMPORTANT) The get-fedora page, with all of the updates >>> and suggestions that have been discussed since the F9 release > [...] >> and our draft implementation: >> >> http://craigt.fedorapeople.org/get-fedora/get-fedora The solution we had in the mockup (that this doesn't seem to be following) was to just offer 32-bit live desktop by default and other arches are hidden under a 'more options' link. Most consumer machines, especially now that Apple has gone with intel chips, can run x86. If you have no idea of your machine's architecture (and I am betting most folks who want to try Fedora for the first time do not) x86 is a very safe bet. If you do know what your machine's arch is, and it's not x86, you are more than capable to click one more link to get x86_64 or ppc. This page is just too busy, IMHO. There is too much text, and it asks too many questions. What our plan had been before when we discussed this, was to offer the Fedora live desktop spin x86 with one click. ~m -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
