On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 13:34 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2008-08-13 04:01:35 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > > We need one CMS solution (for sanity sake), although >1 install might be > > OK(?), to cover: > > > > * fedoraproject.org > > * docs.fedoraproject.org > If you don't mind, I'd like to focus this discussion on > docs.fedoraproject.org first - the way I see it, if a CMS won't work for > docs, then it's not worth using it on fp.o (plus maintaining a > completely separate setup for docs). > > The one main requirement (featurewise) from fp.o would be not breaking > translator workflows. What features/use cases does docs need/want? You are totally correct. My reason for jamming it together was to capture and move one-time the various ACL'd pages in the wiki. Another option we've discussed previously is to move them to e.g. Packaging: namespace. Then we have to re-jiggle the default search, etc. But it is far less disruptive. Ideally we'd match or improve the l10n workflow, such as by kicking out PO files from the CMS in to Transifex. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
