On 2008-08-13 04:01:35 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > We need one CMS solution (for sanity sake), although >1 install might be > OK(?), to cover: > > * fedoraproject.org > * docs.fedoraproject.org If you don't mind, I'd like to focus this discussion on docs.fedoraproject.org first - the way I see it, if a CMS won't work for docs, then it's not worth using it on fp.o (plus maintaining a completely separate setup for docs). The one main requirement (featurewise) from fp.o would be not breaking translator workflows. What features/use cases does docs need/want? Thanks, Ricky
Attachment:
pgpgUu3oyub2g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
