On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 03:16 +0000, richard-harrison@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > appreciated if we can hear your comments or suggestions. > From Lyceum's faq: > > "The main difference between Lyceum and MU is the database schema. MU > creates a set of tables for each blog in a system. Lyceum uses a fixed > number of tables for the entire system." IOW, Lyceum does it right, MU does it wrong, from a strictly technical standpoint. > From a resource/performance perspective, is that wise? How great a > risk is there that "small" and "medium" (fuzzy terms) volume blogs may > suffer performance hits due to their "much larger" brethren? Unless the software is coded in a grossly inappropriate manner, little to none. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
