> appreciated if we can hear your comments or suggestions. >From Lyceum's faq: "The main difference between Lyceum and MU is the database schema. MU creates a set of tables for each blog in a system. Lyceum uses a fixed number of tables for the entire system." >From a resource/performance perspective, is that wise? How great a risk is there that "small" and "medium" (fuzzy terms) volume blogs may suffer performance hits due to their "much larger" brethren? What about backup and maintenance issues, e.g., one table "issue" kills many blogs? Since I have no sense of projected data volume or anticipated numbers of blogs competing for shared resources/tables, these questions are blind. -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
