No problem...we are not trying to force a solution where it is not
wanted. As one of our brand principles states, we are all about
"choice"....
e
Grant Shipley wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Max Spevack wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jesse Eversole Jr wrote:
Anyone who would like to know more about how our website tracking
infrastructure works please feel free to contact me. It suffices to
say that you will find it far superior to awstats having been a
user of awstats in the past.
To be clear:
I am not proposing that Fedora *stop* using awstats. I love awstats.
I am trying to open the door for Jesse to explain to the Fedora
webmasters how we can make a few tweaks to enable Omniture, and why
that would be useful to the larger body of Red Hat, and be a
reasonably simple thing for Fedora to do.
Jesse, could you give these folks some details? I'm opening the
door for you, but you've gotta step through it :)
Not to be negative but Fedora has avoided using proprietary software
or services as much as possible and quite successfully. It is bad
enough that trend is not kept as much within Red Hat but why
proliferate it within Fedora too?
Rahul
While I agree that tracking Fedora downloads and web site traffic is a
great idea, I don't think Omniture is a good fit to do this. Omniture
is a great web site statistics and analytics tool but I agree with
Rahul on this one -- It doesn't fit well with the mission of Fedora.
--
grant
--
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
