-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I like the simplicity of the Gnome website too. Thomas Chung wrote: > On 4/24/07, Thomas Chung <tchung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 4/24/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> So Fedora is starting to mature a bit more in size and I wanted >>> >> to get >>> this ball rolling. >>> >>> Since fedora.redhat.com is now gone the wiki is our official >>> content site. There's a couple problems with that, performance >>> is an >> issue and >>> most content on the wiki is developer oriented. One thing >>> we're >> working >>> on right now for the F7 release is a simple plone instance for >>> the fedoraproject.org landing page. Note, the wiki isn't going >>> away, >> but >>> when users go to fedoraproject.org they'll see more end-user >> content. >>> >>> My question for you guys is, once FAS2 is done and we get into >> having >>> more 'official content'. What do you guys want to do with a >>> plone site? The doc's guys will have their own site. Is >>> anyone >> interested in >>> this project? The idea is that the 'official' fedora site will >>> >> be very >>> small. Having only minimal information for end users and >>> potential contributors. It would then link to the larger sites >>> like the wiki. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Mike >> >> Hi Mike, Can we see the site in development yet? I've been >> thinking we could use the plone site for >> news/communication/marketing site for fedora end-users. Of course >> a plenty of distribution/project information should be available >> which lead to joining various Fedora Projects including >> developments and testings. > > BTW, I really like simply approach such as http://www.gnome.org/ - -- Pramod Venugopal pramod@xxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGL7HtX5FtsCrAzXYRAmucAJ4sMNVVbr5hyqU8Ko0zWUL4rbmAJwCgqSII jD6Yf96XtqFi6Ki+DwbkUCk= =1ZNK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
