On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:18 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Beyond that I > wanted to state my concerns with this patch. If we can get this > incorporated upstream, I think it's great. If not my concern is ongoing > maintenance. It's never a fun thing to keep a local fork up to date. > I'll leave it entirely up to the websites team but I wanted to point out > that there are steep requirements long term with this patch which may > muck with future upgrades and I want to make sure everyone considers it > for an aesthetic change. If the code is reasonable to maintain, there is a good chance upstream will accept it, I think. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
