On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 09:37 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > Very, very, very lightweight calendar, please. I find that they full- > > featured groupware-type stuff coming through a WUI ... is, uh ... not my > > favorite way to do things. I'd much rather a semi-readable, hand-edited > > Wiki. > > Yep. I see the calendars as simple, authoritative ics files. One for all > the meetings, one for events, one for release schedule for FC. That's it. Fine enough. :) > > We really need something we can make PO files from, if we want to keep > > content easily updated. These can then be checked into CVS and pulled > > out by the trans teams. > > > > Remember, they have existing tools, we do not. We must make our tools > > use their tools, from the start. We can request an odd-ball, one-off > > translation now and again, but not on a regular basis. > > So, what can we make PO files from? Is the current f.r.c system in CVS > good enough for this? No. xml2po is what we use for documentation, and the stuff in CVS is far from that. That said, if we have a regular $FORMAT the files are in, we could task someone with writing or modifying a tool to create PO files from whatever. That said, it is probably better to do the site in XML, instead. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
