On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 02:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thomas Chung wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >I just noticed that "fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx" is not the default reply address > >for this list. > > > >I think it should. > > > >Anyone agree with me on this matter? Say "Aye" or "Nay" :) > > > > > Aye!, IMO no voting is necessary to do sensible things like this. Just do it My -1 was implied by the fact that I intentionally set up the list to have no munging. It is more than just MHO that munging is wrong and harmful. I'll leave the googling to you, but many smart and wise people agree that "munging reply-to is considered harmful." I don't like lowering standards of behavior to match stupid practices. The default should be to do no harm. Accidentally sending to one person v. a list is easy to fix. Accidentally sending to a list instead of one person is not so easy to fix. Especially when private thoughts are archived publicly. That said, if no one turns up to back up this position, oh well. I'll let the consensus have enough rope to hang itself with. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
