> It's not just me and you who will make the decision. I'm just throwing my ideas and > recommendation. We should consider *all* recommendations from *all* us then put it on > vote as we are living in a democratic world. I don't want to see a *single* individual > make all the decisions for *all* of us. We're not a democracy. We never have been one. anyone who thinks fedora has been democratic hasn't been paying attention. Moreover it SHOULD NOT be democratic. It should focus on the merits of the items involved. So let's stop talking about voting on things. That way lies madness. > As for my website, I'm going with Drupal for next CMS. Yes, I'm going to maintain the > package and audit the modules on my server. > > No, I'm not a PHP programer and I probably don't have as much experience as you do. I'm not a php programmer and don't have any desire to learn. After years of php exploits affecting hundreds of programs I did everything I could to disable php everywhere I encountered it. > Perhaps, we started in wrong foot. All I wanted and the primary reason to join Fedora > WebGroup was to help develop/maintain Fedora Community Website. I'm not really > interested in *system administration* of fedoraproject.org Right and that's ALL I'm interested in. The maintenance and the security of the website. > I'll step aside for now so *real* system administrators can make the decision. I'll > accept whatever CMS as a WebGroup decides. I'm not asking anyone to step aside - but I am asking that we try to focus on on languages and packages that have: 1. programmers who use and develop on in the project. 2. some history of a security infrastructure 3. the package in fedora core or extras with an active maintainer. -sv
