Re: Formatted Final Output from dnf5 update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/12/24 00:22, Will McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 12:19, Tim Evans <tkevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Apparently, I'm not describing this well enough.  At the very end of a
run of the old dnf (that is, now 'dnf4 update') there is a nicely
formatted little report printed.  Looks like this, in context:

   Cleanup          : qadwaitadecorations-qt5-0.1.6-2.fc41.x86_64
   21/22
   Running scriptlet: gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
   22/22
   Cleanup          : gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
   22/22
   Running scriptlet: gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
   22/22

Upgraded:
   gnome-settings-daemon-47.2-2.fc41.x86_64
   kf6-filesystem-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   kf6-kguiaddons-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   kf6-kwindowsystem-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   nspr-4.36.0-2.fc41.x86_64
   nss-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   nss-softokn-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   nss-softokn-freebl-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   nss-sysinit-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   nss-util-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
   qadwaitadecorations-qt5-0.1.6-3.fc41.x86_64


Complete!

Compare this to the mess you've quoted.

Have you considered reporting/requesting this in the upstream project? 

Bear in mind Fedora aggregates & integrates multiple projects. There are a few project maintainers on the list but your voice might be more clearly heard upstream: https://github.com/orgs/rpm-software-management/projects/4/views/1?filterQuery=summary

There's one backlog item around upgrade summary being too wide, but as you've said, that's not your issue: https://github.com/orgs/rpm-software-management/projects/4/views/1?filterQuery=summary&pane=issue&itemId=34740133&issue=rpm-software-management%7Cdnf5%7C785

I can't see any existing issues requesting reinstituting the behaviour you want: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+summary

So you might be best kicking off that upstream discussion directly with the maintainers?

I don't remember ever seeing that sort of final display from dnf4. Was there specific options used that produced that?

regards,
Steve


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux