On 7/12/24 01:43, Barry Scott wrote:
On 6 Dec 2024, at 13:13, Tim via users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suppose there could be symlinks that don't point to something, now,
but might in the future? Or, normally do, but didn't at the time of
your test.
Seems that all the dangling symlinks on my KDE VM are owned by RPMs.
I ran this to find this out the state of symlinks:
sudo symlinks -r / | grep dangling | while read A B C; do echo $B; rpm -qf $B; done | grep 'is not owned'
Thanks Barry. I have 3 dangling symlinks at the moment, and your script says they are not owned by any package. Not being owned is not surprising as all 3 are "lock files" for Firefox and Thunderbird both of which are not rpm installed, they are both upstream daily versions of the two applications. I was trying to understand the target of the symlink, which in the case of these 3 symlinks begins with my local IP address, being 192.168.1.109:+5960 (for firefox). So after a few tests it has become obvious they are making use of what seems to be standard Linux functionality, in that Linux allows the creation of symlinks linked to non-existent locations.
regards,
Steve
Barry
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
