Re: What is DNF Check-upgrade Actually Doing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/30/24 4:24 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 1/12/24 10:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/30/24 3:44 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 1/12/24 10:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/30/24 3:04 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 30/11/24 20:05, Tim via users wrote:
As a comparison, have a look through your menus for "view source" and
see what a message looks like before Thunderbird converts it into its
own HTML rendition of the message (regardless of whether it was HTML or
plain text).

Thunderbirds re-rendering of messages is yet another reason that
I don't like it.
I did a "view source" and after trawling through all the headers to get to what looks like your response there is no plain text and no html, it displays like encrypted data, there is nothing visible at all the matches your text.

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

The plain text is encoded as base64.

Thanks Samuel, I understood that the mails were mime encoded, but when I viewed the source to see whether when I previewed or opened the mail I was looking at plain text or a html version which is my preferred version, I was expecting to see the body of the email as either plain text or html tags, particularly when viewing the mail makes it look like the client is working with html.

The funny thing with your emails is that the plain text part is base64 encoded and the html part is not.
That's interesting, I would have expected both to be the same. I used to use the "Auto" compose option, which supposedly sends the mail as plain text if there is no formatting otherwise it sends it as html, but after I think you requested that I stop sending through html, I changed the option to send both html and text for the relevant client to decide which one it was going to use, hence I would have expected both to be encoded, which I thought was a mail standard. I'm using a version of Thunderbird that is several versions ahead of what's in the Fedora repositories, and I think I'm on the mail list for Thunderbird, so I'll raise it on there to see if I get any feedback.

There's nothing wrong with it. base64 encoding is normal. I just thought it was funny that only the plain text was encoded like that.

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux