On 11/25/24 08:33, Doug H. wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 8:10 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41 (from fc 40)
wine-staging 9.21 & 9.17 (WineHQ)
I noticed that `dnf upgrade wine-staging` left me on 9.17. On
investigation, I found that my /etc/yum.repos.s/winehq.repo's
baseurl was still on "40". vi'ing (editing) it to "41" solved
the issue.
Question: when I upgrade Fedora from a prior Fedora release,
am I required to manually vi my winehq.repo to the new release
or was this a fluke? I need this info for my notes of Fedora
release upgrades.
I don't have Wine installed, so don't know if it is different there, but I don't have "41" in any of my configs. Everything is using "$releasever"...
pwd
/etc/yum.repos.d
egrep "39|40|41" *
egrep "releasever" * | wc -l
129
Thank you!
I just submitted a bug report at WineHQ:
Please correct baseurl on WineHQ.repo
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
