On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 8:10 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 41 (from fc 40) > wine-staging 9.21 & 9.17 (WineHQ) > > I noticed that `dnf upgrade wine-staging` left me on 9.17. On > investigation, I found that my /etc/yum.repos.s/winehq.repo's > baseurl was still on "40". vi'ing (editing) it to "41" solved > the issue. > > Question: when I upgrade Fedora from a prior Fedora release, > am I required to manually vi my winehq.repo to the new release > or was this a fluke? I need this info for my notes of Fedora > release upgrades. I don't have Wine installed, so don't know if it is different there, but I don't have "41" in any of my configs. Everything is using "$releasever"... >pwd /etc/yum.repos.d >egrep "39|40|41" * >egrep "releasever" * | wc -l 129 -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
