Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:04 PM home user via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/6/24 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> Related, be sure to look in /lib/modules for old kernel artifacts.
> >>> There have been several bugs related to proceccessing old kernel
> >>> removals. The removal scripts would _not_ remove the directory if they
> >>> were not empty, and the script had a bug that left a few small files.
> >>>
> >>> Something like this is safe to run to cleanup /lib/modules:
> >>>
> >>> # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185410
> >>> clean_lib_modules() {
> >>>       if [[ -d "/lib/modules" ]]; then
> >>>           echo "Cleaning /lib/modules"
> >>>           # dirs=($(ls /lib/modules))
> >>>           mapfile -t dirs < <(ls /lib/modules)
> >>>           for dir in "${dirs[@]}"
> >>>           do
> >>>               dir="/lib/modules/${dir}"
> >>>               if [ "$(du -s -B 4096 "${dir}" | awk '{print $1}')" -lt 4096 ]
> >>>               then
> >>>                   echo "  removing ${dir}"
> >>>                   rm -rf "${dir}" 2>/dev/null
> >>>               fi
> >>>           done
> >>>       fi
> >>> }
> >>
> >> I do not fully understand that script, but I did the clean-up.  5 old directories, each having several times 4096 blocks were left behind.  I don't know if the problem is in dnf, a database, or something/somewhere else.  But post patching clean-up seems to be an ongoing problem.
> >
> > The script uses `du` to count the size of files in the directory tree
> > of each [previously installed] kernel. If the size is less than 4K, it
> > deletes the directory tree. If the size is greater than 4K, then it is
> > not touched.
> >
> > Here's an example of what causes the accumulation of leftovers in
> > /lib/modules from a Linux Mint machine. As I understand things, the
> > kernel uses the same scripts everywhere. Notice the "dpkg:
> > warning...".
> >
> > Removing linux-modules-5.15.0-122-generic (5.15.0-122.132) ...
> > (Reading database ... 375164 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Purging configuration files for linux-modules-5.15.0-122-generic
> > (5.15.0-122.132) ...
> > dpkg: warning: while removing linux-modules-5.15.0-122-generic,
> > directory '/lib/modules/5.15.0-122-generic' not empty so not removed
> > Purging configuration files for linux-image-5.15.0-122-generic
> > (5.15.0-122.132) ...
> > Purging configuration files for linux-modules-extra-5.15.0-122-generic
> > (5.15.0-122.132) ...
> > ...
> >
> >> I'm still needing the answer to the core questions of this thread.
>
> Several directories were cleaned out.  But several (5) sub-directories were left behind and are still there.  All are over 36000 4-k blocks  The oldest are 6.2.*, dating back to f-37.  Likewise, /boot still has 5 files from 6.10.12 (f-39).  S-o-m-e t-h-i-n-g in the patch and upgrade processes is not cleaning up properly.

`package-cleanup --oldkernels --count=2` might help with that. It
removes all old kernels except the current kernel and the one before
it.

You can also manually do it. For each old kernel listed in
/lib/modules, do something like this:

    export kernel_ver=6.11.5-200.fc40.x86_64
    dnf remove \
       kernel-$(kernel_ver) \
       kernel-core-$(kernel_ver) \
       kernel-devel-$(kernel_ver) \
       kernel-modules-$(kernel_ver)

Once you manually remove the old kernels, then run clean_lib_modules
to remove the old artifacts in /usr/modules.

Jeff
-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux