On 11/1/24 17:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
dnf5-5.2.6.2-1.fc41.x86_64
How do I tell dnf5 I want to replace an fc39 package of
the same revision?
Many thanks,
-T
Followup.
With all the suggestion over on
https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?333513-DNF-how-do-I-overwrite-older-release-packages-of-the-same-version&p=1887940&posted=1#post1887940
I managed to get
# rpm -qa | grep -i fc39 | grep -v kernel
libmetalink-0.1.3-32.fc39.x86_64
libgle-3.1.0-29.fc39.x86_64
libmodulemd1-1.8.16-10.fc39.x86_64
libgit2_1.6-1.6.5-1.fc39.x86_64
bind-license-9.18.28-2.fc39.noarch
down to
libgle-3.1.0-29.fc39.x86_64
I did not realize the libgit2_1.6 was part of the file name (the
underscore). When I did, they removed with ease.
# rpm -qa libgit2*
libgit2_1.6-1.6.5-1.fc39.x86_64
libgit2_1.7-1.7.2-1.fc41.x86_64
libgit2-1.8.2-1.fc41.x86_64
And libgle does not have an fc41 version yet. I reported it over on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323466
-T
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
