On 6/30/24 10:55 AM, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:36:13 +0930
"Tim via users" <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 13:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I didn't notice this originally, but you're still on F36 and expecting
help with it?? Maybe you should try using something current instead of
trying to track down issues in discontinued software.
But *what* is wrong? Are packages claiming they depend on things that
they don't? Is a mention that something could be used (though not
required) falsely attributed as a dependency? Does the DNF/RPM
database have a cockeyed view of what depends on what?
...
Why are they getting this so wrong? Because even if this particular
(gstreamer) screwup doesn't exist in Fedora 40, the generic remove one
thing and it destroys everything situation keeps cropping up again and
again.
--
It's really annoying that when you try to delete a package, it deletes a whole bunch of packages that didn't depend on that package and previously worked without it.
Do you have an actual example?
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
