On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:36:13 +0930 "Tim via users" <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 13:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > I didn't notice this originally, but you're still on F36 and expecting > > help with it?? Maybe you should try using something current instead of > > trying to track down issues in discontinued software. > But *what* is wrong? Are packages claiming they depend on things that > they don't? Is a mention that something could be used (though not > required) falsely attributed as a dependency? Does the DNF/RPM > database have a cockeyed view of what depends on what? > ... > Why are they getting this so wrong? Because even if this particular > (gstreamer) screwup doesn't exist in Fedora 40, the generic remove one > thing and it destroys everything situation keeps cropping up again and > again. > > -- It's really annoying that when you try to delete a package, it deletes a whole bunch of packages that didn't depend on that package and previously worked without it. BR, Bob -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
