Re: tigervnc won't remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:07 PM ToddAndMargo via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:



On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

How do I fix this?

You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
no-longer
needed dependencies.

dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it.

On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote:
  > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root     15 Apr 24  2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 ->
  > librpm.so.9.4.0
  > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24  2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0
  >
  > so
  > cd /usr/lib64
  > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9
  >
  > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there.   But if that link is
  > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are
  > also gone.
  >

# ls -al librpm.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root     16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 ->
librpm.so.10.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0


Hmmmmmmm ...


Okay,

I got dnf to work again with the following:

/usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9
/usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9

Now how do I fix it right?

Just posted:
     dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm
     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732


On 11/15/23 08:02, Roger Heflin wrote:
> It would have to be some sort of package problem.   Unless something
> specifically deleted that so.9 link (which seems unlikely).
>
> Clearly dnf thinks it needs so.9 but you only have so.10
>
> I just upgraded my fc38 machine and have so.9 and this rpm version.
>
> What fedora version do you have and what rpm do you have?
>
> rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i librpm.so
> rpm-libs                  /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9
> rpm-libs                  /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0
> rpm -qa | grep -i rpm-libs
> rpm-libs-4.18.1-3.fc38.x86_64
>

I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`.
Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded
to 10.


_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux