On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I fix this?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
no-longer
needed dependencies.
dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it.
On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 ->
> librpm.so.9.4.0
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0
>
> so
> cd /usr/lib64
> ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9
>
> Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is
> missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are
> also gone.
>
# ls -al librpm.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 ->
librpm.so.10.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0
Hmmmmmmm ...
Okay,
I got dnf to work again with the following:
/usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9
/usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9
Now how do I fix it right?
Just posted:
dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
