On 24 Oct at 01:05, Dave Close <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's one of the reasons I find consumer "routers" to be barely worthy > of the name. They're really wifi access points with some routing things > built in. And the WiFi usually isn't that great. And the firmware usually isn't that great. And...well. > I'd say get a good WAP and a separate router that can really > do what a router should be able to do. The ERX I mentioned does not > include any wifi (though I think Ubiquiti does make more expensive units > which do both). I'm too old-school Unix; I still think "do one thing, and do it well" should be a mantra. (I know, no longer PC in this age of--ugh--systemd.) So get a cable modem that can be put in bridge mode (or, as in the case of Comcast with a static IP, as close as possible). Get a good hardware firewall--either an appliance, or RYO in Fedora or your distro of choice. Get one or more meshable WAPs. Yes, Ubiquiti UniFi is still the most professional-grade that's close to retail pricing, even after their price increases. Cheers, -- Dave Ihnat _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
