Re: After F35->F38 install, video player, firefox not behaving well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/10/23 03:00, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Since my second to most recent post, I tried gnome with X11.
Got a useful error message: no H.264 decoder.
Now, with X11, videos can play videos.
Firefox can play videos with either wayland or X11.

I am using the Nightly upstream version of Firefox on X11 with KDE (I tend not to use Wayland) and I can play videos from youtube and Netflix without any issues. I did have issues playing both youtube and Netflix videos a while ago that were being indicated as firefox not being able to play protected content, which was resolved by installing the Widevine addon, the H264 addon is being indicated as being installed by default. I also have the play DRM protected content in Firefox's general settings turned on as well. At the time I was having the issues playing videos in Firefox I was finding that Google Chrome was able to play them without any issues. I am also using the nvidia proprietary drivers from rpmfusion as I have an nvidia geforce rtx 3080 graphics card. I have never had any opengl errors from playing videos in firefox (I've always used the nightly version though), although I have also always used the nvidia rpmfusion drivers (I've also played around with using the Fedora specific nvidia drivers from Negativo) as I have always used nvidia graphics cards.

regards,
Steve

I did a
sudo dnf install 'mesa-*'
It went through, but without apparent effect.

I also did a
sudo dnf install'*nvidia*', but got a whole lot of conflicting requests:
Error:
 Problem 1: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
     provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64 from
     rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - conflicting requests
 Problem 2: package nvidia-settings-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts with nvidia-settings
     provided by nvidia-settings-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64 from
     rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - conflicting requests
 Problem 3: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-cuda-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
     with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
     provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - conflicting requests
Problem 4: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
     with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
     provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - package akmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires nvidia-470xx-kmod-common >= 3:470.199.02,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - package akmod-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires nvidia-kmod-common >= 3:535.113.01,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
Problem 5: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
     with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
     provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-power-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx(x86-64) = 3:470.199.02,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - package nvidia-xconfig-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia >= 3:535.113.01,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
Problem 6: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
     with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
     provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
  - package akmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires nvidia-470xx-kmod-common >= 3:470.199.02,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-power-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia(x86-64) = 3:535.113.01,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - package kmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
     from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
     requires akmod-nvidia-470xx = 3:470.199.02-3.fc38,
     but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests

I added some line breaks for legibility.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Roger Heflin wrote:

mesa is what provides opengl.

Best guess is:
mesa-dri-drivers, mesa-vdpau-drivers and mesa-va-drivers-freeworld
that have video drivers, but also some other mesa pieces that provide
opengl may need to be install (or installing the above may install
those extra pieces).

I have
mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64                     23.1.8-1.fc38
mesa-vdpau-drivers.x86_64                   23.1.8-1.fc38
mesa-va-drivers.x86_64                      23.1.8-1.fc38
and lots of others.

glxgears and glxinfo will tell you the opengl install state.

glxgears will run on bot X11 and wayland.
On wayland I have
[hennebry@2001-48F8-3004-2CE-0-0-0-2723-dynamic ~]$  glxgears -info
GL_RENDERER   = llvmpipe (LLVM 16.0.6, 128 bits)
GL_VERSION    = 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 23.1.8
GL_VENDOR     = Mesa
The claimed frame rate is over 700.

On X11, the renderer is i915 (chipset Q33) and the
claimed frame rate just under 60.

On both glxinfo claims 390 GLX Visuals and 840 GLXFBConfigs,
all of which have None or Slow as a caveat.

i915 reminds me:
My monitor's native resolution is 1440x900.
After installing F35, 'twas a mighty struggle
to get anything other than 640x480.
I do not recall details of the battle.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:17?AM Michael Hennebry
<hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can anyone play videos on F38?
If so, how did you do it?

Firefox in uncommunicative when it will not play a video.
Videos says "cannot initialise OpenGL support".



Attachment: OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux