Re: After F35->F38 install, video player, firefox not behaving well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No point in installing nvidia if you don't have nvidia graphics hardware.

The VGA chip from the lspci you included is from a really old machine,
so I would be shocked if anything performed very good.

All video and opengl is going to be software with a device that old.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:01 AM Michael Hennebry
<hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since my second to most recent post, I tried gnome with X11.
> Got a useful error message: no H.264 decoder.
> Now, with X11, videos can play videos.
> Firefox can play videos with either wayland or X11.
>
> I did a
> sudo dnf install 'mesa-*'
> It went through, but without apparent effect.
>
> I also did a
> sudo dnf install'*nvidia*', but got a whole lot of conflicting requests:
> Error:
>   Problem 1: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
>       provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64 from
>       rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - conflicting requests
>   Problem 2: package nvidia-settings-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts with nvidia-settings
>       provided by nvidia-settings-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64 from
>       rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - conflicting requests
>   Problem 3: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-cuda-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
>       with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
>       provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - conflicting requests
> Problem 4: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
>       with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
>       provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - package akmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires nvidia-470xx-kmod-common >= 3:470.199.02,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - package akmod-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires nvidia-kmod-common >= 3:535.113.01,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - conflicting requests
> Problem 5: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
>       with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
>       provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-power-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx(x86-64) = 3:470.199.02,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - package nvidia-xconfig-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia >= 3:535.113.01,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - conflicting requests
> Problem 6: package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver conflicts
>       with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
>       provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>    - package akmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires nvidia-470xx-kmod-common >= 3:470.199.02,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-power-3:535.113.01-1.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires xorg-x11-drv-nvidia(x86-64) = 3:535.113.01,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - package kmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.199.02-3.fc38.x86_64
>       from rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver
>       requires akmod-nvidia-470xx = 3:470.199.02-3.fc38,
>       but none of the providers can be installed
>    - conflicting requests
>
> I added some line breaks for legibility.
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> > mesa is what provides opengl.
> >
> > Best guess is:
> > mesa-dri-drivers, mesa-vdpau-drivers and mesa-va-drivers-freeworld
> > that have video drivers, but also some other mesa pieces that provide
> > opengl may need to be install (or installing the above may install
> > those extra pieces).
>
> I have
> mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64                     23.1.8-1.fc38
> mesa-vdpau-drivers.x86_64                   23.1.8-1.fc38
> mesa-va-drivers.x86_64                      23.1.8-1.fc38
> and lots of others.
>
> > glxgears and glxinfo will tell you the opengl install state.
>
> glxgears will run on bot X11 and wayland.
> On wayland I have
> [hennebry@2001-48F8-3004-2CE-0-0-0-2723-dynamic ~]$  glxgears -info
> GL_RENDERER   = llvmpipe (LLVM 16.0.6, 128 bits)
> GL_VERSION    = 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 23.1.8
> GL_VENDOR     = Mesa
> The claimed frame rate is over 700.
>
> On X11, the renderer is i915 (chipset Q33) and the
> claimed frame rate just under 60.
>
> On both glxinfo claims 390 GLX Visuals and 840 GLXFBConfigs,
> all of which have None or Slow as a caveat.
>
> i915 reminds me:
> My monitor's native resolution is 1440x900.
> After installing F35, 'twas a mighty struggle
> to get anything other than 640x480.
> I do not recall details of the battle.
>
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:17?AM Michael Hennebry
> > <hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can anyone play videos on F38?
> >> If so, how did you do it?
> >>
> >> Firefox in uncommunicative when it will not play a video.
> >> Videos says "cannot initialise OpenGL support".
>
>
> --
> Michael   hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "I was just thinking about the life of a pumpkin.
> Grow up in the sun, happily entwined with others,
> and then someone comes along, cuts you open, and rips your guts out." -- Buffy
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux