On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 21:06 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > > > One of the big problems (pun intended) that was that your swap > > > had to > > > be sufficiently bigger than your RAM to handle whatever the swap > > > file > > > was doing at the time PLUS being able to dump memory into it. > > > Patrick O'Callaghan: > > Certainly, but having two files rather than one makes no practical > > difference. > > If one was dedicated for hibernation, there'd never be any contention > for its use, and hopefully would have been created at the proper > size. Yes, it could be treated independently from swap considerations which would be useful. However the technical limitations would still apply (no COW, preallocated space, need to work out the physical offset for the bootloader etc.), though there's no reason that couldn't be done by the system installer or indeed enabled later by a special app rather than the present very error-prone manual methos. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
