On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 12:48 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 17:18 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I agree that making this simpler is a worthy goal, but it's the > > same goal > > in both cases. Not using the hibernation file for swap doesn't gain > > you > > anything. > > One of the big problems (pun intended) that was that your swap had to > be sufficiently bigger than your RAM to handle whatever the swap file > was doing at the time PLUS being able to dump memory into it. > Certainly, but having two files rather than one makes no practical difference. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
