On 7/9/23 15:51, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 4:03 PM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/9/23 03:52, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
9005 came from upstream and Fedora repo not removing
their garbage when when dnf remove was issued, which
is the second bug.
How is this anything to do with the Fedora repo when that file came from
a third-party something?
I _think_ someone showed it was from Fedora 39.
I'm curious to know which repos are enabled on the machine. Is it
something beyond a traditional Fedora install?
$ dnf repolist enabled
repo id repo name
fedora Fedora 38 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 38 OpenH264 (from Cisco) - x86_64
fedora-modular Fedora Modular 38 - x86_64
updates Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Updates
updates-modular Fedora Modular 38 - x86_64 - Updates
Jeff
It was upstream's version for FC37. FC38 exists
in upstream's repo. FC39 not as of now.
And upstream kept trying to install fc37's version,
which is why I dumped it and went back to the
Fedora repo.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
