On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 18:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 17:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo <ToddAndMargo@xxxxxxxx> said:
# rpm -qa libvirt-libs
libvirt-libs-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
Removing and reinstalling both libvirt-daemon and
libvirt-libs did not change the symptom.
I tried downgrading. That did not help either.
If I had to guess, I'd say you have some other libvirt.so.0 somewhere
that is preempting the Fedora libvirt-libs provided copy. No idea how
you'd get that though.
# ls -al /usr/lib64/libvirt.*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Jul 8 17:23 /usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0
-> libvirt.so.0.9005.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5072216 May 6 17:00
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0.9000.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5160904 Jul 4 17:00
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0.9005.0
You have something messed up still because you shouldn't have that 9005
one. What does "rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0.9005.0" show?
Oh look at this:
I switched the link from libvirt.so.0.9005.0
to libvirt.so.0.9000.0. Now it can't
find `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0`
# libvirtd --daemon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not found
(required by /lib64/libvirt-lxc.so.0)
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not found
(required by /lib64/libvirt-qemu.so.0)
Be very careful here since you've been installing other things. Earlier
you ran "/usr/sbin/libvirtd", but now you're running "libvirtd" which
looks to be something else. What does "which libvirtd" show?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
