On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:19 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > So Fedora can supply the executable (and source) but not the > > documentation? Is there something wrong with this picture? > > The executable/source doesn't come from POSIX, it comes from glibc. > It just implements the interface defined by POSIX (which is freely > reimplementable). No doubt. However it still makes no logical (rather than legal) sense to me. To repeat: if the canonical documentation is legally restricted, Fedora should at minimum give a pointer to it in the man pages. I actually looked at the POSIX reference and found it IMHO pretty useless to be honest, so Fedora could certainly improve on it with an independent implementation (of the docs). poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
