Re: following thunderbird upgrade to 102, it takes over 1h of 100% CPU to start

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/09/2022 11.11, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and
they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong.  You can check
what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you
can reclassify it as being non-junk.

For what it's worth, that's certainly the way other programs worked.
As mail is processed, spam rules are made somewhere else.

Back when I used a program using Bayesian rules, I quickly programmed
it in two stages:  Using a folder of lots of kept spam, selected them
all, and flagged them as spam.  And folders of kept non-spam, selected
them all, and flagged them as non-spam.

It was quite effective, but for one thing:  If a mailing list became a
source of spam, and you kept marking mail from it as being spam, the
system can add the mailing list itself as being spam.

Eventually I settled on not using junk detection, using a separate
email address for mailing lists, having that address *only* accept mail
from those lists.  You get no false positives (real mail getting
falsely flagged as spam), and the few that slip through I just hit the
delete button once or twice each day (yes, it's that few).

False positives are a huge curse.  You lose touch with friends, you
miss jobs and incoming bills.  If you have to keep checking your junk
mail folder for them, what's the point of using spam filtering?  You're
going to see the spam, anyway.

I mark the spam folder to only show unread messages. This way I see what was added
before marking all as read (after unJunking any mistakes).

--
Eyal Lebedinsky (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux