On 4/4/22 22:47, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 4/4/22 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports
on the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and
you could use the same SSID on both devices. You would need to
disable the DHCP server on the Nighthawk and most likely need to give
the Nighthawk a static IP address on the LAN because they usually
don't support getting it from DHCP.
At that point the Nighthawk would be just another switch, which doesn't
seem helpful *or* secure.
It's helpful because he needed more wireless coverage. At least that
was my understanding. The BGW210 is already doing NAT, so there's no
further security (and much complication) to be gained with a second NAT.
If he doesn't need the extra wifi, then the Nighthawk is redundant.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
