On 4/3/22 23:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/04/2022 09:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I'm going to try to coalesce the bits of information from various
emails, but it's still mostly blanks...
Is the BGW210 connected via DSL or the Optical uplink port?
I've basically been following, yet ignoring this thread. As the amount
of words make it difficult for understand the
network topology. It would be correct to say that I'm lost.
I would have thought that the simple act of replacing the ISP supplied
equipment the "pace 5238ac" with the "BGW210-700"
would be transparent. Apparently not.
Maybe the original box was in bridge mode. This new one doesn't really
have a proper bridge mode, although there are things you can do to kind
of simulate it.
If I read a latter email correctly, the OP will be posting a link to a
network diagram to make things clear..
I also don't quite understand why a system can't be connected directly
to one of the ports of new "BGW210-700" just
to test that it works. The system could be configured with one of the
assigned IPs or testes with DHCP and see if the new
DSL router assigns an IP.
His second router is connected there and is getting an IP address.
That's the 192.168.x.x range. On the other side of his router is
10.0.x.x. So double NAT which is not great.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
