Re: Rclone issue with Google Drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 12:22 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I would if this were a test version of the RPM, but it
> > isn't. It's the standard version from the base repo. I may
> > file a BZ report.
> 
> It looks to me like that upstream doesn't consider anything
> but their binaries as official. :(
> 
> This might be due in whole or in part to having to register
> the app with the API for each supported service, but the
> effect appears to be that no one can build from source
> without hitting this limitation.
> 
> That is unfortunate, though I'm not sure the Fedora packages
> can fix it (upstream might not be able to either).
> 
> The package could patch `-DEV` out of the Version string in
> fs/version.go, though the packages do try to do that via
> LDFLAGS (refer to line 144 in the rclone spec file)¹.
> 
> I was curious and killing time avoiding real work, so I
> built the package with the version file patched instead of
> only trying to override it via LDFLAGS, to see if that
> reported the version without the -DEV.  It does remove the
> '-DEV' suffix:
> 
>     $ rclone version
>     rclone v1.57.0
>     - os/version: fedora 35 (64 bit)
>     - os/kernel: 5.15.16-100.fc34.x86_64 (x86_64)
>     - os/type: linux
>     - os/arch: amd64
>     - go/version: go1.16.13
>     - go/linking: dynamic
>     - go/tags: none
> 
> I don't know if that's enough to allow the build to work
> without the 7-day limitation, as I don't use rclone.  Please
> feel free to give that a try and see if it helps.  It'd be
> great if it were that simple.  If so, I can submit the
> change to the package maintainer easily enough.
> 
> The scratch build and package changes are at:
> 
>     https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82292527
>    
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/tmz/rpms/rclone/c/9ab47be63?branch=fix-version-string-harder
> 
> It would be ideal if upstream and downstream packagers could
> come to some sort of arrangement to improve the situation.
> That presumes upstream would be interested in having builds
> which didn't come directly from their site.
> 
> ¹
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rclone/blob/045ab834f/f/rclone.spec#_144

That's an interesting proposal. I'll have to wait to test it because of
the 7-day timeout (I don't know a way of speeding that up) but in the
meantime I'll pass this on to the Rclone forum to see if there's a
response.

poc
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux