Re: Gnome Nautilus and no thumbnails from connected Android storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 25/10/2021 03:00, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Oct 24, 2021, at 20:56, Tim via users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 16:34 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
This is intentional.  In order to make thumbnails, it would have to
read the entire files from the device over the slow MTP link.  Most
people would be very unhappy about that because they wouldn't be able
to do anything else until everything is read from the phone.
The same can be said about other networking protocols, which is why we
had options to display them, or not, and let us make the choice about
consequences.

Trying to find a photo from a phone is a pain, they don't have useful
filenames.  You've got to go trawling through them all to find
something.  If you're organised, you might move photos into sensible
folder names as you go along.  And you might decide that it is worth
turning on thumbnails to find the specific photo out of 20 from last
week's birthday party.
If you read the context in the gitlab issue I posted, basically performance is terrible when previews were being generated. Someone complained (back when it was originally filed) that it should be controlled by a setting and the Nautilus/gvfs developers chose not to.

The only way it’ll be switched back is to open a new issue, perhaps with a merge request with code improving the threading performance enough to make thumbnails not bring the whole interface to a stall.

Again - this should be given back to users that executive decision - which I'd advocate for - whether or not users want/need thumbnails off their Android phones. Problem in the past was not - if I remember correctly - that transfer was slow. It rather was that the whole system would "freeze" what such transfer took place. It really could be simple - "Show Thumbnails = All files" does what is says OR expand with one extra entry "All files excluding USB Phone". Anything really, but don't keep users in the dark .. perhaps because they are all simpletons and.... devs know better.
many thanks, L.
ps. how can a user file such a request, in Bugzilla?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux