On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Patrick writes: > > > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the > > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be > > used to ensure that only trusted software is run. > > "Pragmatically speaking ..." ;-) Seriously, I think TPM mostly makes > sense with VMs. People who write programs are generally going to be > very unhappy with the amount of kissing up to the TPM they have to > do. > Like, on Mac every time LLVM releases a new version of the debugger I > have to go through the self-signing dance. So far I have been > satisfied with the results every time (there really are new features > or performance improvements), but it's infrequent enough that I have > no memory of the procedure, let alone muscle memory. Indeed. I have no particular interest in TPM as such. My original question was aimed at anticipating possible issues with VMs and Windows 11 if I ever get round to installing it, but that seems to be resolved. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
