On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new > > > system, > > > are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has > > > this > > > already been dealt with? > > > > qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 either as a passthrough or an > > emulation. > > I haven't tested it yet, but I assume it works. > > I tested it and Windows 10 let me enable bitlocker, so it definitely > accepts it. Nice. That would seem to make the whole underlying concept of a TPM absurd, given that you can emulate it (unless that means it has actually been signed by some authority of course). poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
