Re: Windows 11 VMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 10:29 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
> 
>  > In the case of Windows 11 under a VM, as you say the software TPM
> can do
>  > what it likes. In effect, there is no more guarantee than with a
> system
>  > without a TPM and the message that Windows 11 can only be used
> where a TPM
>  > provides a trust base might give a false sense of security.
> 
> That depends on the implementation of the virtual TPM.  Although from
> what I'm reading it shouldn't transparently virtualize the hardware
> TPM (if present), the hardware TPM can be used to provide a trust
> root
> for the virtual TPM, which can then attest to the VM.  I would assume
> that to really trust any system, you'd need to have out-of-band
> knowledge of the TPM's identity, whether hardware or software.  It's
> true that there's more room for malware to wedge itself in in this
> setup, but in theory it should work.
> 

I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the user
takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be used to
ensure that only trusted software is run. OTOH, I think one application
of TPM (at least when originally proposed) was to prevent the user from
bypassing DRM, in which case the trust goes in the other direction and
the situation is different.

> As for "false sense of security", that has been a Microsoft business
> model at least since they trumpeted "Orange Book Level C" security
> (the highest you can get without physically securing the device) for
> Windows NT in the 1990s -- which certification was invalid if you
> changed the physical configuration of the device (insert floppy!),
> connect to a network, or install software.
> 
> Security is hard, the weakest link is often your personnel, you
> shouldn't say you care about security unless you have a specialist
> auditing your systems, and any other generic statements about
> security are marketing drivel. ;-)

Absolutely.

poc
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux