2021-04-12 19:12 UTC+02:00, home user <mattisonw@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > (context) > In the "invisible application after upgrade" thread, Ed did not know how > I did my upgrade to f33. I responded that I mostly followed the Fedora > upgrade instructions from here: > "https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/";, > and listed the sequence of commands that I did. That included the steps > symlinks -r /usr | grep dangling > symlinks -r -d /usr > from the "Clean-Up Old Symlinks" section. Andras responded that > > This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks > > may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will > > compromise the integrity of the package they belong to. > If Andras is correct, then the upgrade instructions need to be changed. > Based on past experience, when a bug is submitted against Fedora > documentation, the Fedora documentation team will want suggestions on > how the document should be worded. > > (question 1) > What should the instructions say? Is there a better yet easy and safe > way to find and clean out dangling symlinks? Maybe more detail should > accompany "After you verify the list of broken symlinks"? I don't know, but maybe a script that checks if the link belongs to a package, and only removes it if it doesn't. But I'm not sure it's worth the hassle. (Especially that that output of symlinks is not very useful in a script. As far as I can see, one would have to extract the filename from it using a(n adimittedly, probably quite simple) regexp.) > (question 2) > In a later post, Andras provided and example of a dangling symlink (in > the "hunspell" package) that should not be deleted. When I was a C/C++ > programmer (a long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away), dangling > pointers (and memory leaks) were naughty; they can cause serious > problems. Isn't a dangling symlink a file system parallel to a dangling > pointer in a C/C++ program? I'm not an expert but I'm pretty sure it's not. > What good, valid purpose is there for a > package to have a dangling symlink? Or maybe "hunspell" needs a little > clean-up? Probably no and yes. But it's not just hunspell. Far from it! Andras _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
