On 3/3/21 11:50 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
the dm-multipath should be ok, so long as multipathd is not there. grep -i del_part_nodes /lib/udev/rules.d/* shows the multipath delete rule. I am on 32 and don't see anything else using it. if you cat the rule with the del_part_nodes code you could see if anything else on 33 uses it.
del_part_nodes appears only in /lib/udev/rules.d/68-del-part-nodes.rules which has at the start: # To suppress this, use the kernel parameter "dont_del_part_nodes", # or create an udev rule file that sets ENV{DONT_DEL_PART_NODES}="1". As I cannot change the kernel par, I added a (found online) /lib/udev/rules.d/00-dont-del-part-nodes.rules with SUBSYSTEM=="block", KERNEL=="sd*|dasd*|rbd*", ACTION=="add|change", \ ENV{DONT_DEL_PART_NODES}="1" and rebooted but nothing changed. GiP _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure