Re: Weird boot problems.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That looks like multipath is blacklisted.

you might to a lsinitrd | grep -i multipath and make sure it is not in
the initrd with a config file.

multipath is the only service I have seen that actually deletes
partition mappings, but it is possible that some of the other dm*
stuff might (dm-raid maybe?)..

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:35 AM GianPiero Puccioni
<gianpiero.puccioni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/3/21 12:39 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > Blacklist the wwwid in multipath.conf and/or blacklist the disk type
> > in multipath.
> >
> > And/or whitelist the disks you want multipath to manage.
> >
> > If all of your disks have 2 paths and are expected to have 2 paths
> > then you can set file_multipaths to only manage devices with 2 paths,
> > but to make multipath work right in the one path case the disks need
> > to be listed in the bindings file.
> >
> I am not sure I understand any of this, as shown before I have only 1 disk with
> sda                      8:0    0 931.5G  0 disk
> ├─sda1                   8:1    0     1G  0 part
> └─sda2                   8:2    0 930.5G  0 part
>    ├─fedora_node06-root 253:0    0    50G  0 lvm  /
>    ├─fedora_node06-swap 253:1    0     4G  0 lvm  [SWAP]
>    └─fedora_node06-home 253:2    0 876.5G  0 lvm  /home
>
> So I think that sda2 is managed by multipath but sda1 is not.
> I do not have a multipath.conf and "multipath -t" writes A LOT of stuff, while
> "multipath show config" gives:
> Mar 03 13:29:38 | /etc/multipath.conf does not exist, blacklisting all devices.
> Mar 03 13:29:38 | You can run "/sbin/mpathconf --enable" to create
> Mar 03 13:29:38 | /etc/multipath.conf. See man mpathconf(8) for more details
> Mar 03 13:29:38 | DM multipath kernel driver not loaded
>
> Not sure what this means or what is the proper way to do what you said.
>
> > The short term is add ,nofail to the options on the mount then it will
> > always boot up but may not mount /boot.  But make sure /boot is
> > mounted when doing the things mentioned below.
> >
> > The bios finds the data on /boot and puts what is needed to boot into
> > memory, once that is done you really only need /boot on the machine if
> > you are updating kernels/changing grub options/rebuilding initrds.
> >
> Yes that was why I did not things stay the way they are, after all it works.
> One possibility could be to use an rc.local (the systemd equivalent or a proper
> service) to run "partprobe" and "mount" at start, would this work?
>
> GiP
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:19 AM GianPiero Puccioni
> > <gianpiero.puccioni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/2/21 10:24 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> >>> On 3/2/21 5:04 PM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> >>>> so it is there and seen but why the block device is not created? Copying
> >>>> the content of (sda1)boot into /boot and reinstalling grub could probably
> >>>> work but how?
> >>>
> >>> Hi GianPiero,
> >>>
> >>> This is strange. I don't know why there's no device file for the first
> >>> partition (/dev/sda1).  Can you try "partprobe /dev/sda" to see if it creates
> >>> the file?
> >>
> >> Thanks all for the help
> >>
> >> I didn't know this command (never neded it..) but yes, it did create the file
> >> now I have
> >> # ls  /dev/sd*
> >> /dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2
> >>
> >> and "blkid" has
> >> /dev/sda1: UUID="f365a320-f3d7-4c07-8bfb-f0164b9ce8c0" BLOCK_SIZE="4096"
> >> TYPE="xfs" PARTUUID="6ccdd7fd-01"
> >> that wasn't there before.
> >>
> >>> Are you sure /dev/sda1 was used for /boot ?
> >> I think so(it was the partion marked as bootable), and now that I can mount it I
> >> can see that all the usal /boot stuff is there.
> >>    Can you
> >>> show the output of "cat /proc/cmdline"?
> >>>
> >> # cat /proc/cmdline
> >> BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,msdos1)/vmlinuz-5.10.19-200.fc33.x86_64
> >> root=/dev/mapper/fedora_node06-root ro resume=/dev/mapper/fedora_node06-swap
> >> rd.lvm.lv=fedora_node06/root rd.lvm.lv=fedora_node06/swap rhgb quiet
> >>
> >> As Roger said the problem seems to be multipath but
> >> if there is no fix to the fact that sda1 disappeared (any idea?)
> >> I suppose the solution now could be to copy all the stuff from sda1 in /boot and
> >> recreate grub in sda ignoring sda1. Unless it needs a separate /boot, I think
> >> UEFI is disabled but I am not sure, or for the weird RAID stuff.
> >>
> >> As I said I am doing all this remotely so I have to be careful not to break the
> >> boot.
> >>
> >> Thanks again.
> >>
> >> GiP
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> >
>
>
> --
> GianPiero Puccioni            |Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi-CNR
> gianpiero.puccioni@xxxxxxxxxx |Via Madonna del Piano, 10
> T:+39 0555226682              |50019 Sesto F. (Firenze) ITALY
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux