On 22/1/21 12:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/21/21 5:00 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 22/1/21 10:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, rkhunter has a history of occasional "false positives" as
changes occur.
A google search of the form
rkhunter libkeyutils.so.1.9 site:bugzilla.redhat.com
Hi Ed, I just installed rkhunter and issued the command you specified
and got the message, Invalid option specified: libkeyutils.so.1.9.
Have I done something wrong?
That wasn't a command. That was a search string to enter into Google.
Thanks Samuel, I hadn't thought about it that way.
Just on the topic of rkhunter, I've run the command rkhunter --check and
gotten a number of warnings. Among them were warnings about
/usr/bin/egrep, /usr/bin/fgrep, /usr/libexec/nm-ifdown and
/usr/libexec/nm-ifup having been replaced by a script and obviously not
whitelisted. Would the replacement of those commands be something done
within package management and rkhunter hasn't been updated to cater for
that, or am I encountering a situation where those commands have been
changed by something outside of the package management environment?
regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
